top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureBrendan Quinlan

Harmony in Bytes: Navigating the Waves of AI Collaboration in Creativity and Ethics


"Machine learning, a large field of artificial intelligence, is not easily explained. But, if you have to put it in simple terms, machine learning is the process of training a computer to make decisions without explicit programming." - Alan Turing


Embarking on a topic that's bound to turn heads, we delve into the intricate world of artificial intelligence, or AI—a subject both relevant and controversial in the ever-evolving landscape of technology.


My first encounter with the term AI traces back to the captivating narratives of sci-fi, where AI characters often seized control of the world's destiny. Later, my understanding deepened as I explored the development of video games, where AI played a pivotal role in shaping the dynamic and immersive virtual worlds we navigate. The very concept of AI carries an air of intimidation for many, me included, owing to the profound implications it might bring.


But before we unravel the dual nature of AI—its awe-inspiring potential and disconcerting aspects—let's establish a fundamental understanding of what AI truly represents. In the earlier years of my life, AI was portrayed as a thinking computer—a sophisticated brain capable of learning and self-improvement. In the gaming realm, an example of this translates into bots adapting to a player's unique driving style in a racing game, introducing an ever-evolving challenge. Or even the subtle actions of the player being monitored in the background—think like it is done in Silent Hill.

At its core, artificial intelligence, or AI, is the scientific pursuit of creating machines that can emulate human thinking. It's about performing tasks deemed 'smart' by processing vast amounts of data in ways distinct from human cognition, with the ultimate goal of recognising patterns, making informed decisions, and exercising judgment.


The spectrum of AI encompasses various forms, including reactive AI, limited memory AI, and the pinnacle of sophistication—self-aware AI. Each type exhibits different degrees of responsiveness to stimuli and capacity for experiential learning.


I concur with Steve Jobs' sentiment and find solace in the analogy of technological advancements as waves. His profound perspective encapsulates the gradual unfolding of progress. In his own words, "Things happen fairly slowly, you know. They do. You can see these waves of technology way before they happen, and you just have to choose wisely which ones you're going to surf. If you choose unwisely, then you can waste a lot of energy, but if you choose wisely, it actually unfolds fairly slowly."


During the 1980s and 1990s, Jobs accurately foresaw the impact of technology and the internet on daily life, predicting the emergence of virtual assistants like Siri and e-commerce giants like Amazon long before their actual inception. His foresight proved remarkably accurate. However, the evolution of virtual assistants, while promising, may still require adjustments before reaching a level of reliability we can fully depend on.


From my perspective, AI represents the next wave in this continuous sea of technological evolution. At a design thinking event, I engaged in a conversation with someone who aptly expressed, "AI is the New Web," drawing parallels between the transformative potential of AI and the revolutionary impact of the Internet.


How would it be with the new Web3, though? The assertion that "AI is the New Web3" encapsulates a profound analogy, likening the transformative influence of artificial intelligence (AI) to the evolutionary phases of the internet. In this comparison, AI emerges as the next significant wave in technological advancement after the interactive web (Web 2.0). Much like the internet's transition from static to dynamic content, the statement implies that AI is not merely a feature but a foundational element poised to reshape the fabric of our digital interactions. By aligning AI with the concept of the New Web3, it suggests a paradigm shift, emphasising AI's potential to become as integral and pervasive as the internet itself. This analogy underscores the ubiquity, structural impact, and foundational nature of AI, positioning it as a driving force in the ongoing evolution of our technological ecosystem.


I don’t think AI is perfect. It’s got a long way to go when it comes to development, ethics, and even some regulations on its use. Despite its immense potential, AI is far from flawless. Its trajectory requires further development, ethical considerations, and the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks. Taking a reflective stance on the past can offer valuable insights into the future, and I'll illustrate this through two compelling stories.


The first story comes from someone I deeply admire—Lorne Lanning, co-founder and president of the video game developer Oddworld Inhabitants. Before his tenure at Rhythm and Hues and Oddworld Inhabitants, he received classical training in photorealistic painting. During this period, he worked as what could be referred to as a hand-colourist, meticulously blending paints to create swatches that precisely matched the shades of clothing or shadows.


He encountered a significant challenge when trying to match a particular shade, staying up all night to overcome it. Eventually, he succeeded in the task. However, the turning point came when he attended a presentation the next morning. During this event, they showcased a revolutionary tool—a precursor to today's Eyedropper tool in programs like Photoshop. This tool could flawlessly match the exact swatch, rendering Lorne's painstaking efforts obsolete. His immediate reaction was, "Shit, I'm out of a job. I can't cope with that!" Yet, this moment marked a turning point in his career, propelling him to advance and grow, ultimately shaping the path he walks today. This captivating story serves as a testament to the swiftness with which changes can transpire and underscores the importance of anticipating what lies ahead. In the grand tapestry of technological evolution, AI emerges as the next frontier, and comprehending its trajectory provides a strategic advantage in navigating the intricate and ever-shifting technological landscape.


Another example is more based on history, and I like to think of it like it was back in the Industrial Revolution.


The Industrial Revolution, which unfolded in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, marked a transformative era in human history. With the introduction of mechanised production methods, the way goods were crafted underwent a profound change, impacting various industries and significantly improving production for artisans. Take, for instance, the baking of bread. Prior to industrialisation, bakers relied on manual labour for tasks such as kneading and shaping dough, limiting the scale and efficiency of production. The advent of machinery, like the dough kneader and industrial ovens, revolutionised the baking process. Artisans could now produce larger quantities of bread, meeting the growing demands of a rapidly expanding population.


Similarly, in the realm of culinary arts, the canning of chilli con carne exemplifies the positive impact of industrialisation. Before the advent of canning technologies, preparing and preserving complex dishes like chilli con carne was a labour-intensive process. Industrial canning introduced a method for preserving food on a mass scale, allowing artisans to reach broader markets. This not only made such culinary delights more accessible to a wider audience but also provided economic opportunities for those involved in the preparation and distribution of these products. The Industrial Revolution, with its machinery and innovations, not only enhanced the efficiency of production for artisans but also contributed to the democratisation of various goods, shaping modern consumption patterns.


Just as the Industrial Revolution revolutionised manufacturing through mechanised production, AI is transforming industries through automation and intelligent systems. The introduction of AI, much like the advent of machinery during the Industrial Revolution, brings about a paradigm shift in how tasks are executed. Just as machinery enhanced efficiency in the baking of bread, AI-powered automation streamlines processes across various sectors, from routine administrative tasks to complex decision-making. AI, akin to industrial machinery, can perform tasks at unprecedented speed and precision, leading to increased productivity.


In the context of the culinary arts, the comparison extends to how AI impacts food-related industries. Much like industrial canning allows for the mass preservation of dishes, AI contributes to the optimisation of food production processes. Automated systems in agriculture, for example, leverage AI to monitor crop health, optimise irrigation, and enhance overall yield. This not only ensures a more efficient food supply chain but also addresses the challenges of a growing global population.


Moreover, just as the Industrial Revolution democratised access to goods, AI has the potential to democratise access to information and services. AI-driven technologies, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, provide accessible and personalised interactions, shaping modern patterns of engagement. The democratisation of AI tools also empowers individuals and businesses across various sectors, from healthcare to education, by providing access to advanced capabilities.


In essence, both the Industrial Revolution and the rise of AI represent transformative periods in human history, reshaping the way we produce goods and deliver services. While machinery defines the industrial era, AI defines the digital era by introducing intelligent automation, innovation, and accessibility on a global scale.


Navigating the integration of AI in industries poses both opportunities and challenges. From my perspective as a designer and concept artist, my stance has evolved from initial scepticism to a nuanced belief that AI can be a valuable collaborator, provided it's approached with caution and thoughtful regulation. The potential benefits of AI in creative processes, exemplified by programmes like ChatGPT and Vizcom, are undeniable. These tools streamline workflows, enhance creativity, and offer new possibilities for artistic expression. However, my belief is anchored in the importance of maintaining a balance—leveraging AI as a tool rather than letting it become a crutch. It's essential to ensure that human creativity and intuition remain at the forefront, guiding AI's contributions rather than being overshadowed. Moreover, I advocate for the implementation of robust regulations to address ethical concerns, promote transparency, and prevent unchecked growth. A collaborative approach, where AI augments human capabilities rather than replacing them, aligns with the idea of responsible innovation, fostering a harmonious relationship between human creativity and artificial intelligence in the realm of design and concept art.


The ongoing use of AI, particularly programmes like ChatGPT, has sparked concerns and debates within the creative industries, leading to discussions about the ethical implications of these technologies. There's a growing sentiment that the proliferation of AI-generated content may potentially undermine the role of human writers. This concern has, in part, contributed to tensions within creative fields, such as the film and music industries, culminating in discussions about the need for regulations and ethical guidelines. Some argue that the use of AI in creating voices for movies, games, or music raises questions about artistic authenticity and the potential sidelining of human creativity. I share the sentiment that while AI can be a valuable tool, its integration should be approached with care to ensure it complements human creativity rather than supplanting it. The recent history of writers' strikes underscores the importance of finding a harmonious balance that fosters innovation while preserving the vital role of human expression in the creative process.


As a creative individual, the widespread use of AI in generating scripts, art, and storyboards for major franchises like Marvel presents a notable concern for me. While the efficiency gains and innovative possibilities brought about by AI are evident, the potential sidelining of human creativity and the intimate, emotional nuances that artists and writers infuse into their work become a significant negative aspect. There's a distinct worry that the collaborative and distinctly human nature of creative endeavours may be compromised, leading to a potential homogenization of artistic expression. Striking a delicate balance between the capabilities of AI and the irreplaceable touch of human creativity is crucial to preserving the unique essence that makes creative works resonate on a deep and emotional level.


On a personal level, my journey as an aspiring concept artist has been deeply rooted in the traditional, hand-drawn methods that characterised the industry long before the advent of AI. I've always looked up to incredible artists in both the gaming and film realms, drawing inspiration from the captivating worlds they brought to life. The evolution of programmes like Midjourney, however, has been a source of discomfort for me. Witnessing the transition from the tactile feel of pencil on paper to digital platforms has been bittersweet. I distinctly recall taking a stand on platforms like Artstation, vehemently pointing out instances where Midjourney seemed to blur the line between inspiration and outright theft, undermining the genuine efforts of artists. The lack of clear copyrights or regulations in this sphere has been a glaring concern. It's disheartening to see the potential undercutting of the significance of a concept artist or illustrator in favour of cost-saving AI, a trend that underscores the urgent need for a reevaluation of laws and a renewed appreciation for the irreplaceable touch of human creativity in the realm of concept art.


Despite my reservations about Midjourney's potential for art theft, I do acknowledge its utility in specific creative processes. I believe it can be effectively utilised in the early stages of concept creation, such as developing mood boards or exploring general design directions. For instance, envisioning an armour design for a mediaeval warrior in a space setting could benefit from the rapid generation capabilities of Midjourney. In this scenario, it serves as a tool to capture the broad strokes of the desired aesthetic and evoke a preliminary sense of the intended direction.


To elaborate, the process might begin with inputting basic parameters like the mediaeval warrior's silhouette, the space environment, and thematic elements. Midjourney could swiftly generate a range of potential designs, offering a visual exploration of various possibilities. This initial phase allows for a quick evaluation of overarching concepts, helping artists and designers refine and iterate on the chosen direction before diving into the detailed and nuanced aspects of the design. While caution must be exercised to ensure ethical use, integrating Midjourney in these early stages can indeed streamline the creative workflow and facilitate a more informed and inspired final design.


Transitioning to a programme like Vizcom in the later stages of concept development offers a valuable opportunity to refine and elevate the initial ideas generated by Midjourney. After the broad strokes have been established, Vizcom can be employed to add layers of detail, depth, and storytelling to the concept.


In the case of our mediaeval warrior in space, Vizcom can be used to flesh out intricate armour details, experiment with material textures, and fine-tune the overall aesthetic. Its capabilities for rendering and visualising concepts in a more polished manner allow for a more comprehensive exploration of the design. Artists can leverage Vizcom's features to play with lighting, explore colour palettes, and experiment with different compositions to evoke the desired mood and atmosphere.


By integrating both Midjourney and Vizcom into the creative process, artists can benefit from a dynamic workflow that combines the rapid ideation capabilities of AI with the detailed craftsmanship of human creativity. This synergistic approach not only streamlines the design process but also ensures a harmonious blend of innovation and artistry in the final concept.


It's crucial to emphasise that the integration of programmes like Midjourney and Vizcom does not diminish the role of human input in the creative process. Instead, these tools serve as collaborators, augmenting the artist's capabilities and expediting certain aspects of the workflow. The initial use of Midjourney to generate broad concepts or mood boards acts as a springboard for inspiration, allowing artists to quickly explore and evaluate different directions.


As we transition to Vizcom for the detailed refinement of our mediaeval warrior in space, human input becomes even more integral. Digital painting, designing, and drawing remain essential elements of the process. Artists can leverage their expertise to meticulously craft intricate details, infuse personal artistic style, and make nuanced decisions that an AI might not capture. Vizcom becomes a canvas for the artist to express their creativity, adding layers of depth, emotion, and storytelling that are inherently human.


In essence, the use of AI tools enhances efficiency and aids in the exploration of ideas, but the core essence of design and artistry remains firmly rooted in human skills. Collaboration between AI and human creativity ensures a synergistic approach that values each person's unique contributions. This leads to a final concept that combines innovation with the deeply personal touch of art.


I strongly believe that even if AI tools like Midjourney and Vizcom were to become standard in concept art workflows, it's crucial to emphasise their optional nature. Each artist possesses a distinctive approach to creating art, and the choice to integrate or not should remain entirely at the discretion of the individual. Our diverse methods of producing art are part of what makes the creative landscape so vibrant, and it's essential to preserve the autonomy of artists. Not everyone may find these tools conducive to their artistic process, and that's entirely valid. The important thing is to create a space where artists can pick the tools that work best for them so that AI is added as a helpful addition and not as a necessary change in the way things are done creatively.


Regulating AI to foster collaboration rather than disruption necessitates a comprehensive and thoughtful approach. First and foremost, the development and implementation of ethical frameworks are essential. These frameworks should prioritise transparency, accountability, and fairness, addressing issues such as biases, user privacy, and responsible AI development. Concurrently, the establishment of clear legal standards tailored to AI technologies is crucial. These standards should delineate the rights and responsibilities of AI developers, users, and the legal liabilities associated with AI-generated content.


Moreover, strengthening intellectual property laws is imperative to address the unique challenges posed by AI-generated creative works. This involves crafting guidelines on ownership, attribution, and the protection of content produced with AI assistance. A very important part is educating users. This needs thorough programs that help users, creators, and industries understand what AI can and can't do, as well as ethical issues and how important human input is in the creative process.


Collaboration across industries is a key component of effective regulation. Encouraging cooperation between AI developers, regulatory bodies, and industry stakeholders will contribute to the creation of standardised practices that promote ethical and responsible AI use. Continuous monitoring and adaptation mechanisms must be in place to ensure that regulations evolve alongside technological advancements, societal changes, and emerging challenges.


International cooperation is vital for developing a cohesive global framework. Such collaboration addresses challenges that transcend national boundaries, fostering a unified approach to ethical and responsible AI development. Public engagement is equally essential, involving the public in the regulatory process to incorporate diverse perspectives and ensure that regulations align with broader values and concerns.


Establishing incentives for responsible AI development, such as tax incentives or grants, encourages adherence to ethical guidelines and standards. Regular audits and assessments of AI systems are critical to evaluating their impact on society, creativity, and human well-being. A strong regulatory framework can use these steps to guide the creation and use of AI technologies, making sure they improve teamwork, creativity, and human values instead of hurting them.


AI should be approached as a collaborator rather than a replacement in various professional spheres. While AI technologies can bring about increased efficiency and innovation, the notion of replacing human roles with artificial intelligence raises ethical and societal concerns. Machines cannot replicate the distinctive traits of human creativity, intuition, and empathy. Instead, AI should be harnessed to augment human capabilities, freeing individuals from mundane tasks and enabling them to focus on more complex, creative, and value-driven aspects of their work. It is crucial to recognise the irreplaceable qualities that humans bring to the table and ensure that the integration of AI is conducted ethically, preserving job opportunities, fostering a harmonious collaboration between humans and machines, and contributing to overall societal well-being.


In a hypothetical scenario where AI remains unregulated in the future, the potential consequences could be far-reaching and multifaceted. Unchecked AI development could lead to increased automation across various industries, potentially resulting in job displacement for a significant portion of the workforce. If there aren't any rules in place, ethical problems like biased AI algorithms, invasions of privacy, and bad people using AI for bad things could get worse. The lack of standardised guidelines could also contribute to a disparity in AI development, with certain entities wielding disproportionate influence and control over these powerful technologies. This unregulated landscape might impede transparency, making it challenging to hold developers accountable for the ethical implications of their creations. It's getting harder and harder to find a good balance between new ideas and moral concerns. This could mean that in the future, the problems that come with AI will be bigger than its benefits.


It's almost comical how science fiction keeps waving the cautionary flag about unregulated AI, yet it seems we're determined to treat it like a rebellious teenager testing boundaries. In the Warhammer 40K universe, they swapped AI for the existential dread of convicts on death row—because nothing says "safety first" like tapping into the angst of the condemned. Then there's Skynet, the Terminator's ominous overlord, and the iconic Hal 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Maybe it's time we take a break from sci-fi marathons and start heeding the lessons they've been desperately trying to teach us about the perils of letting AI run wild. After all, the last thing we need is a future where our toasters have existential crises or our coffee makers decide to go full Terminator on us. But we are even going into the avenue of robotics.



I wholeheartedly believe that Isaac Asimov's Laws of Robotics should serve as guiding principles in the ethical application of AI. Asimov's wisdom encapsulated the essence of responsible AI use, emphasising the paramount importance of safeguarding human well-being. The first law, stating that a robot may not injure a human being or allow harm through inaction, establishes the foundational commitment to prioritise human safety above all. The second law, requiring obedience to human orders unless conflicting with the first law, reinforces the notion of AI as a tool under human control. Lastly, the third law, mandating the protection of the robot's existence without conflicting with the preceding laws, adds a dimension of self-preservation within ethical boundaries. Applying these laws to AI would not only set a moral compass for its development but also ensure that AI technologies align with the fundamental principles of humanity and responsible innovation.



In conclusion, the landscape of artificial intelligence presents a duality of promise and challenges. From sci-fi realms to historical parallels with the Industrial Revolution, the journey unfolds, emphasising AI's role as a collaborator rather than a replacement. The creative integration of tools like Midjourney and Vizcom in design workflows highlights efficiency gains while preserving human creativity. However, the uncharted territory of unregulated AI raises concerns, echoing the cautionary tales from science fiction. Navigating this path requires ethical frameworks, international collaboration, and adherence to guiding principles, such as Isaac Asimov's Laws of Robotics. As we tread into this evolving frontier, it's crucial to heed the disclaimer on the ChatGPT screen: "ChatGPT can make mistakes. Consider checking important information." A reminder that human touch and critical evaluation remain indispensable in the realm of artificial intelligence.


“The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.” - Isaac Asimov, Isaac Asimov's Book of Science and Nature Quotations, 1988



7 views0 comments
bottom of page